Lisa Park


Clearfield's Lisa Park was promoted into the Director of Operations role from within the firm's team. This means she arrived at the most structurally challenging version of the peer-to-manager transition: she knew everyone, everyone knew her, and the relationships that had made her effective as a peer were now the exact relationships most at risk of undermining her effectiveness as a manager.

Her first Friday lunch back with the team three months into the role — when the conversation shifted and she understood in an instant that she had become the person who brought management directives to lunch — is the moment that crystallises what the transition actually required. Not the promotion announcement, not the salary increase, not the new reporting structure. The moment when it became real that the social register had changed and nobody had a protocol for it.

She is methodical, direct, and more willing to have uncomfortable conversations than most people in her position. Her development of the peer-to-manager transition protocol — specifically the three-conversation structure and the specific language she identifies as doing real work — comes from having navigated the transition herself, imperfectly the first time and with increasing clarity over the following months.

Her minimum viable operations dashboard — seven rows, one Google Sheet tab, eight numbers, completed in a single Sunday afternoon — is the publication's most practical demonstration that operations measurement does not require enterprise tooling. It requires clarity about which decisions need to be supported.

What she is known for: The peer-to-manager transition with Tom Blackwell, specifically the first critical feedback conversation about the vendor communication. The minimum viable dashboard that Marcus Adeyemi opened eleven of thirteen weeks in the first quarter — the first operations document he had engaged with consistently in five years. The vendor price negotiation that combined Lever 1 (multi-year commitment) and Lever 3 (case study reference) to avoid $19,200 in excess spend over two years.